Texas A&M-CC
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
495 |
Philipp Baar |
JR |
32:59 |
720 |
Justin Adame |
SR |
33:25 |
854 |
Jason Garcia |
SR |
33:38 |
1,253 |
Cesar Gonzalez |
FR |
34:12 |
1,358 |
Edgar Maritinez |
FR |
34:20 |
1,728 |
Daniel Gerrero |
FR |
34:52 |
1,780 |
Paul Hansel |
JR |
34:56 |
1,919 |
Jacob Abrego |
SR |
35:10 |
2,048 |
Christoph Hintz |
JR |
35:25 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
1.1% |
Top 10 in Regional |
45.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Philipp Baar |
Justin Adame |
Jason Garcia |
Cesar Gonzalez |
Edgar Maritinez |
Daniel Gerrero |
Paul Hansel |
Jacob Abrego |
Christoph Hintz |
Islander Splash |
09/27 |
1142 |
33:09 |
33:24 |
33:51 |
34:05 |
34:59 |
|
33:25 |
34:57 |
35:12 |
UIW Cardinal Invitational |
10/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
34:06 |
34:42 |
|
34:39 |
|
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) |
10/19 |
1135 |
32:59 |
33:25 |
33:21 |
34:00 |
34:08 |
|
36:30 |
|
34:55 |
Southland Conference Championships |
11/01 |
1165 |
33:03 |
34:01 |
33:43 |
34:25 |
34:19 |
34:44 |
|
35:29 |
36:45 |
South Central Region Championships |
11/15 |
1111 |
32:46 |
32:59 |
33:36 |
34:20 |
34:16 |
35:11 |
|
35:24 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
10.6 |
291 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
1.0 |
2.1 |
4.5 |
7.9 |
13.3 |
16.0 |
18.2 |
15.8 |
12.7 |
8.3 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Philipp Baar |
3.0% |
211.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Philipp Baar |
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
2.3 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
Justin Adame |
41.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
Jason Garcia |
50.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
Cesar Gonzalez |
77.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edgar Maritinez |
83.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Gerrero |
107.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Hansel |
110.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
1.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
2.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
4.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
7.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
13.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
16.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
18.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
15.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
12.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
8.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |